login or register to access more options.
SubscriptionYou must login/signup with the site in order to access subscription. |
Contact |
Events |
MentoringWOB Mentoring Program |
ResumePlease login/signup to setup your resume. |
Search |
Practices and procedures relating to the appointment of directors in Australia and New Zealand
February 2004
Market research conducted by Delta Outlooks for

Sponsored by

Women On Boards goes National is a cooperative project between a number of women’s organizations and the Federal Office of the Status of Women. The partners in the project are NFAW (National Foundation for Australian Women), FAAW (Foundation for Australian Agricultural Women), Zonta, Females in IT &Telecommunications and Womensport & Recreation NSW.
Women on Boards (WOB) has been running since 2001. To date it has been successful in getting women onto not for profit boards.
WOB goes National aims to get women onto paid boards. This research is integral to that effort and has been funded by the Office of the Status of Women. The research covers publicly listed companies (1-200 by capitalisation, excluding mining companies) and a range of rural boards.
WOB goes National is about:
Ruth Medd
President NFAW Ltd
Project Director of Women on Boards
Phone 02 9331 8851
Email ruth.ash@bigpond.com
Information in relation to company profiles has been sourced from the following:
Information is accurate to the best of our knowledge as at 20 February 2004.
This research aimed to:
○ We have profiled in detail approximately 400 public companies and rural boards
o Be given to chairmen respondents in return for their assistance
o Offered for sale to other chairmen of boards and to women aspiring to become board members
o Used for publicity for WOB
This project had four phases:
This report has been compiled from a combination of analysis of data on approximately 400 public companies and rural boards plus surveys of 60 board chairmen and 38 women directors. Please see the methodology section for more detail.
The proportion of board members who are women is extremely low (7% of board members are women) and this is unlikely to increase significantly in the foreseeable future.
This expected lack of increase in the proportion of board members who are women is due to:
We recommend that women who aspire to become board directors approach this very proactively and strategically. In addition to reading the detailed advice in this report you should consider the following:
Do extensive research on companies that are in your field of industry expertise through
Objectively evaluate your skills, qualifications and experience – do you really have what it takes? There are different views on this offered in this report.
You are likely to be more successful in approaching larger companies (number employed) than smaller ones and those with better profitability
The time of year in relation to their AGM and whether they have board vacancies is not significantly important. Although if they have the maximum number of board members and they are likely to be re-appointed then your chances are diminished.
Gain board experience on non-paying boards – charities, sporting bodies etc. This gives you a track record and experience in corporate governance. It also gives you an idea of whether you do have the time to commit to a board and whether it is what you expected
Approach the key head hunters, develop and maintain a relationship with them
As one respondent said “Network like crazy”
○ 91% hold one board position
○ 6% hold two
○ 2% hold three
○ 1.2% hold 4 or more board positions.
○ 76% hold one board position
○ 16% hold two
○ 7% hold three
○ 1% hold 4 board positions.
○ ‘Particular skills’ rated 8.6 out of 10
○ ‘Experience related to your industry’ 7.5
○ ‘Other board positions past or present’ 6.4
○ ‘Friend or acquaintance (known to a board member)’ was not considered important (2.9) and nor was ‘Retired or current senior executives from the company’ 2.7
○ 27% mentioned having the right skills and experience including industry experience
○ 25% said women should make themselves known to the chairman and /or current board directors. And a further 8% said that women should have a profile or reputation publicly or in the industry that makes them known
○ Networking, building contacts and gaining a profile, track record
○ Being successful in an executive position
○ Being proactive and strategic
○ Having the right skills, qualifications and experience
Group whose opinion is sought |
Responses by chairs / and company secretary’s |
Responses from female directors |
Other board members |
78% |
53% |
Managing Director/CEO |
57% |
34% |
External paid consultants |
40% |
53% |
Friends/peers |
32% |
29% |
○ the high level of qualifications of women on boards
○ AICD qualifications are held by one third of respondents.
DELTA Outlooks collected data on 412 companies and boards and compiled profiles of 399 organisations. The 412 companies included:
This initial round of information was collected from the Australian Stock Exchange website and from company or association websites.
Of the 412, approximately 80 fit into the rural category. We have also covered 11 transport, 6 utilities and 15 pharmaceutical (as specified in WOB’s rural target list).
The following analysis is based on the 393 companies and organizations for which we obtained board details.
State |
Number of boards which include women |
ACT |
12 |
NSW |
174 |
NZ |
11 |
QLD |
44 |
SA |
19 |
TAS |
3 |
VIC |
98 |
WA |
32 |
Total |
393 |
The 369 publicly listed companies covered represent 26% of the approx 1420 companies listed on the Australian Stock Exchange at any time. Data below is likely to be more positive towards women that is the case in reality due to that fact that:
Company ranked by ASX |
Boards with women |
100 companies ranked between 1 - 176 |
63% |
100 companies ranked between 178 - 302 |
27% |
100 companies ranked between 303 - 440 |
24% |
37 companies ranked between 441 - 500 |
27% |

Item |
No. |
% |
Boards with vacancies |
20 |
8 |
Don't know |
66 |
27 |
Nil vacancies |
159 |
65 |
Total Responses |
245 |
100 |
(393 companies & associations)
○ 91% hold one board position
○ 6% hold two
○ 2% hold three
○ 1.2% hold 4 or more board positions.
○ 76% hold one board position
○ 16% hold two
○ 7% hold three
○ 1% hold 4 board positions.
Multiple positions may be slightly higher than indicated as in some cases a person may be listed under their full first name and in others under their initials. In these cases we may not have identified a few people with several positions.
In addition this includes primarily positions held on the top 500 public companies. Many of these people hold other board positions on companies outside of the top 500.
The important observation is that once appointed to a board women tend to be appointed to more boards on average than men.

No. of board positions |
Men (%) |
Women (%) |
1 |
91 |
76 |
2 |
6 |
16 |
3 |
2 |
7 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
5/6 |
0.2 |
0 |
(314 companies with financial details)
There is a significant trend for companies with better financial results to have women board members.
Status |
Boards with women |
Total boards |
Boards with women (%) |
$5m+ profit last financial year |
64 |
142 |
45 |
$0-5m profit last financial year |
33 |
103 |
32 |
Loss for last financial year |
14 |
69 |
20 |
111 |
314 |
(264 companies with employee details)
There is a significant trend for larger companies (based on employment size) to have women on the board, particularly for those with over 1,000 employees.

No. of employees |
Boards with women |
Total boards |
Boards with women (%) |
1-100 |
10 |
50 |
20 |
101-350 |
15 |
50 |
30 |
351-900 |
13 |
50 |
26 |
901-2,500 |
25 |
50 |
50 |
2,501 – 20,000 |
31 |
50 |
62 |
20,000+ |
10 |
15 |
71 |
Companies that listed post 2000 are more likely to have women on their boards than those that listed earlier.
When listed |
Boards. with women |
Total boards |
Boards with women (%) |
1987 or prior |
46 |
123 |
37 |
1988 - 1999 |
51 |
160 |
32 |
2000 to present |
36 |
85 |
42 |
118 |
349 |
105 |

There is a significant variation by state as indicated below. However please note that the ACT figures are distorted due to 6 of the 7 ACT boards with women on them being Rural boards established by the Federal Government.
State |
Boards with women |
Total boards |
Boards with women (%) |
ACT |
7 |
12 |
58 |
NZ |
6 |
11 |
55 |
NSW |
74 |
173 |
43 |
SA |
7 |
19 |
37 |
TAS |
1 |
3 |
33 |
VIC |
32 |
98 |
33 |
WA |
11 |
32 |
34 |
QLD |
12 |
44 |
27 |
150 |
392 |
38 |

The larger the board, the more likely it is to have one or more women board members.
No. of board members |
No. of boards with women |
Total boards |
boards with women (%) |
2-5 |
12 |
106 |
11 |
6-7 |
52 |
139 |
37 |
8-10 |
58 |
113 |
51 |
11-17 |
28 |
35 |
80 |
135 |
375 |
36 |

(393 public companies and rural boards)
Industry |
Total in sector in sample |
Boards with one or more female directors (%) |
Banking & Finance |
8 |
100 |
Insurance |
5 |
60 |
Process & Petroleum |
5 |
80 |
Research and development |
11 |
64 |
Health, community services |
8 |
50 |
Utilities |
6 |
50 |
Media, Film, Radio & TV |
22 |
41 |
Manufacturing |
48 |
44 |
Real Estate |
34 |
44 |
Retail |
26 |
42 |
Agriculture, forestry / fishing |
23 |
39 |
Energy |
13 |
38 |
Construction |
8 |
38 |
Software & Services |
27 |
33 |
Finance, Business & property services |
56 |
36 |
Health Care equipment & services |
19 |
26 |
Transport, storage |
14 |
29 |
Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology |
15 |
20 |
Technology Hardware & Equipment |
6 |
17 |
Wholesale & Distribution |
19 |
16 |
Hotels Restaurants & Leisure |
11 |
9 |
Telecommunications |
8 |
25 |

We surveyed a total of 60 Chairmen and Company Secretaries. Responses were gained via a combination of email, fax and phone.

Other board members |
78% |
Managing Director/CEO |
57% |
External paid consultants |
40% |
Friends/peers |
32% |
Consultants mentioned were:
Other processes mentioned were:
Board as a whole |
56 |
Nominations committee recommend to full board |
21 |
Chairman in consultation with board |
3 |
Directors and shareholders - anyone can nominate |
3 |
All candidates are put forward |
2 |
Appointments are made as a casual vacancy so name is not presented to the shareholders until the following AGM |
2 |
Board, board rotation, vacancies |
2 |
No vetting except to ensure they are a member because it is an association |
2 |
The Board or 5% of shareholders |
2 |
The chairman |
2 |
10=extremely important and 1= not important
Particular skills (finance, marketing etc) |
8.6 |
Experience related to your industry |
7.5 |
Other board positions past or present |
6.4 |
Friend or acquaintance (known to a board member) |
2.9 |
Retired or current senior executives from the company |
2.7 |

Are there other important issues?
As required depending on vacancies AGM is not relevant to timeline for appointment |
22% |
6 months |
21% |
3 months |
11% |
12 months |
7% |
2 months |
5% |
1 month |
3% |
ASAP |
3% |
Varies |
3% |
Criteria vary depending on overall composition |
2% |
Depends on need of the company at the time |
2% |
Long a period as possible |
2% |
The appointment of a new director does not occur often. Investigation only occurs if and when a vacancy or a need arises. Time is not an issue |
2% |
Approx every 2-3 yrs |
47% |
4-5 yrs |
29% |
More than 7 yrs |
10% |
6-7 yrs |
8% |
Annually |
6% |

As you can see below 77% of boards have at least one vacancy and 60% have 3 or more vacant board positions.
Have appointed members to all positions |
23% |
1 position vacant |
8% |
2 positions vacant |
7% |
3 positions vacant |
23% |
4 positions vacant |
12% |
5 positions vacant |
3% |
6 positions vacant |
8% |
7 positions vacant |
3% |
8 positions vacant |
3% |
No limit |
8% |
One comment offered: Yes particularly due to new company governance requirements
If NO why not
Do currently |
38% |
Have previously |
25% |
Never have had |
45% |

(Totals over 100% as some indicated 2 responses)
1= not likely, 10=very likely
Response – average rating of 5.7
If the likelihood is rated 1-4 please explain why \
Rating |
Comment |
NR |
Depends on skills and experience not gender |
NR |
Gender is irrelevant, talent is |
NR |
Stable board and don't see any changes in the immediate future |
1 |
The real estate industry doesn't appear to appeal to women |
2 |
Fewer women in senior positions within the utilities industry and less contacts |
3 |
Current board structure consists of close personal relationships. Would be difficult to penetrate |
3 |
Directors don't change often |
3 |
Few women have timber industry skills |
3 |
New board and no retirements expected in the next few years. Industry is male dominated and this may have an impact |
3 |
Stable board, no changes foreseen at this stage |
4 |
Current board appointed in 2000-2001 |
4 |
Female skill level in the industry is low. Also if looking for a person with previous director experience then there are many less females than males with such experience |
4 |
The number of female candidates fulfilling the requirements of information technology industry experience is far outweighed by the number of male candidates. From a purely statistical point of view it is therefore less likely |
5 |
Need one or two at least |
5 |
We are currently looking for a board member. The most appropriate person, male or female will be appointed |
6 |
Appoint directors based on their qualifications and experience not gender |
8 |
Subject to industry experience and skills |
NR = no rating given
Insufficient time committed |
15% |
Lack of skills/knowledge |
23% |
Lack of commitment to the company |
5% |
Other problems
• Please do not subscribe to the glass ceiling mentality. Companies are open to female directors and there are many good examples of female directors succeeding in business. Margaret Jackson has certainly impressed me having worked on an audit committee with her). There is a growing awareness and appreciation in the business community of the significant contribution females can bring to leadership and direction of Australian companies
We obtained responses from 38 women via email, fax and phone.
Other board members |
53% |
Managing Director/CEO |
34% |
External paid consultants |
53% |
Friends/peers |
29% |

Other processes mentioned were:
External consultants mentioned were:
Knew someone professionally on the board or in the company |
55% |
Were known because I am on other boards |
42% |
Were contacted by a consultant |
29% |
Knew someone personally on the board or in the company |
26% |

Other comments were:
• Don't tell people you "want to be a director" Just concentrate on developing your expertise/profile/contacts/reputation and keep your eye out for opportunities Mentors are good but no-one will promote your cause better than yourself and no-one will promote you just to be nice, you will have to convince the mentor that you are a good candidate first. Be friendly and pleasant and interested in other people. Be well groomed and dress well (clean polished shoes, clean polished hair, nice not cheap perfume a few really good bits of real jewellery no dangly earrings etc avoid florals but use colour
The things that stand out are the high level of qualifications of women on boards and that AICD qualifications are held by one third of respondents.